A new study uses statistical and data analysis to identify possible vote fraud on a precinct-by-precinct basis. The study’s author, economist John Lott, isolated the vote-counting process of counties with fraud allegations and compared that with outcomes in precincts where there were no allegations of fraud, also looking at in-person v. absentee voting statistics. What did he find? Irregularities demonstrating that despite the left’s protestations to the contrary, precinct-based vote fraud is a legitimate concern and can skew the results of national elections. More from the Daily Signal